Sales: 1-888-DMS-4WEB (367-4932)
Support: 1-877-495-7788
my account username password
Hudson Horizons Blog

Google+ Growth Rate Shattering Competition

By Zack Levine (438 words)
Posted in Google Plus on July 25, 2011

There are (4) comments permalink

Whether Google+ will eventually overtake Facebook and Twitter as the king of social networks is still very much uncertain. This much, however, is already known: in terms of growth rate, it is absolutely smashing them to pieces. The chart below, posted by Google's Leon Haland on Google+, shows just how quickly Google+ is growing compared to the rises of Facebook and Twitter.

Google Plus Growth Rate

As one can see, it took Google+ only twenty-four days to reach twenty million users. It took Twitter 1,035 days to reach the same number. Facebook got there in 1,152 days. To put that in perspective, Google+ got there in roughly three weeks, and Facebook and Twitter got there in roughly three years. Or, to look at it a different way, Google+ reached twenty million users forty-eight times faster than Facebook and forty-three times faster than Twitter. No matter how one examines it, the fact is quite clear: the growth rate of Google+ is running circles around those of Facebook and Twitter.

It would be a mistake, however, to take these numbers at face value; other considerations must be taken into account as well. For one, initially, Facebook users needed to have an ".edu" email address, limiting potential users to those in college. Facebook's growth almost certainly would have been faster without this limitation. Second, social media and networking is huge now, in the time of the launch of Google+. Facebook, it can be argued, made it huge. Google+ does not have to convince potential users of the benefits of social networking the way Facebook once did. Finally, Google+ has one of the world's biggest names behind it as well as a base of almost 200 million Gmail users to market to. Facebook and Twitter had neither of these.

Still, even with all this in mind, one would be remiss to deny the high-speed rise of Google+. Can it keep up its astounding pace? The answer is no; in fact, it is already slowing down. After the way it started out, this much was inevitable. The more important question, however, is this: will Google+ continue to rise and eventually overtake Twitter and Facebook as the top social networking website? The answer is not yet clear.

Do you think Google+ is on its way to the top? For more on Google+, Facebook, and Twitter, please visit Hudson Horizons.

  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Furl
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Twitter

Comments (4)

Stan Poe / BPE, llc posted on: July 25, 2011

Yeah, -Don't quite take those comparisons at face value. When Google+ came on the scene, "Social Networking" had already had tons of promotion and "brand awareness" with the initiation and growth of both Facebook and Twitter. When FB and T' came on the scene... nearly nobody "had a clue" of what the arena was all about or why to give it a second thought~ -SP / BPE, llc

Zack posted on: July 25, 2011

Stan,

Agreed. Google+ was born during the era of social networking, whereas Facebook and Twitter were created before that (and indeed, their rise created the era itself).

That being said, though, I think it is still rather amazing just how fast Google+ is gaining users. Just because we're living in the time of social networking does not mean every social network will do well. Plus, as of now, its still invite only, which makes the high numbers even more amazing!

Thanks for the feedback.

Web 2.0 Design posted on: July 26, 2011

I think that both Google+ and facebook have different significance in the web world..The former's main objective is to drag maximum users while Facebook's basic aim is the formation of groups and idea exchange.

Anna Zeman posted on: July 26, 2011

I agree with Stan, Google + entered on the scene in a time where everyone was already hip to online social engagement. With that said, I think many people have Google + account but very little actually use them (or even know how to use them) so the numbers are a bit misleading.

Talk back - leave a comment

Post a Comment

Post a Comment

Not a robot?